Worked for 21s
U
Agent inputpromptexact model user message · variables highlighted
Handle API request reaction-test-privatemode-eperi-agentic-20260621-2148 from codex-local-api. Prompt: Run an agentic but bounded reaction-test smoke run. First use tool discovery to check whether source-inspection tools are available. Call at most two tools total and do not create persistent projects, councils, surveys, personas, notes, decisions, or artifacts. If external URL fetch is unavailable, use the provided observed_content_facts. The final assistant message MUST be raw valid JSON only, starting with { and ending with }, matching the Sonaloop result contract expected_response_shape. No markdown, no prose outside JSON, no code fences.. Payload: {"test_type": "reaction_test", "url": "https://www.privatemode.ai/de/case-studies/eperi", "audience": "B2B buyers evaluating privacy-preserving AI / enterprise AI security", "observed_content_facts": ["Case study claims eperi reduced model operating effort to about two person-days for under 5 EUR.", "Page references private AI, Confidential Computing and compatibility with OpenAI/Anthropic-style APIs.", "Named CTO quote adds credibility but enterprise buyers may ask for pricing, compliance and verification proof.", "Potential confusing points include unfamiliar model names, EdgeLess Systems context, and proof of technical guarantees."], "ci_gate": {"metric": "sentiment_score", "operator": ">=", "threshold": 0.5}, "requested_output": ["positive reactions", "confusing or credibility-sensitive points", "likely objections", "questions a buyer would ask next", "recommended improvements", "threshold gate result"]}. Requested response format: json. Result contract: [result contract: stimulus_reaction.v1, threshold_gate.v1]. If the result contract contains schemas, return valid JSON only in the expected_response_shape: answer, schema_results, and automation_gate. Fill each schema_results[].result with values matching the named result schema fields. If there is no result contract, return the final automation output in the requested response format.
A
Reasoning#2 · 19:51:023k tok
Prepared tool call: mcp_search_tools.
Tool callmcp_search_tools#2 · 19:51:02 · call -> #3 · 19:51:02 · resultok
Arguments
{
"query": "source inspection URL fetch content",
"limit": 10
}Result
{
"catalogue_size": 81,
"loaded": [],
"results": [
{
"name": "fetch",
"description": "Fetch ONE research record by id (a project/council/synthesis/hypothesis/persona id,\n e.g. from a `search` result). Returns {id,title,text,url,metadata}: `text` is a readable\n rendering you can quote, `url` is its page, `metadata.kind` says what it is.",
"parameter_keys": [
"id"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "attach_evidence",
"description": "Attach a real-world SOURCE (doc/url/note) to a persona to ground its claims.",
"parameter_keys": [
"content_or_path",
"notes",
"persona_id",
"source_type"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "refresh_persona_from_source",
"description": "Refresh a persona from where it came from. Catalog-pulled personas re-pull from\n their recorded catalog ref (drift-safe: a locally modified profile is skipped and\n reported unless force=True — catalog_status shows the drift). Native personas answer\n with the re-authoring recipe (brief_persona -> author -> record_persona) in-band.",
"parameter_keys": [
"force",
"persona_id"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "add_artifact",
"description": "Bring a REAL artifact into a project's council pool so personas react to what is ACTUALLY\n there — a live URL/website, a prototype link (kind='prototype', e.g. Figma), or one side of an\n A/B comparison (kind='variant'). The page is CAPTURED to a grounded text snapshot (title,\n meta, headings, visible copy) + a captured-at timestamp + content hash, so the run is\n reproducible. Capture degrades gracefully (a dead link still stores the ref). Add TWO+ variants\n to compare them in one council (the head_to_head plumbing). Then run brief_council with\n artifact_ids=[...] (or omit it to include all). Pass `capture=False` to store the ref only.",
"parameter_keys": [
"capture",
"key",
"kind",
"label",
"project_id",
"title",
"url"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "brief_persona",
"description": "Gather the prompt + frame to AUTHOR one persona profile from a source\n description. You write the profile JSON from `instructions`, then call\n record_persona. Detects/persists the content language from the description.\n BEFORE authoring: the curated catalog has 300+ ready-made personas with lived\n memory (catalog_search / catalog_recommend → catalog_pull) — author only what\n the catalog does not already cover.",
"parameter_keys": [
"description",
"evidence",
"segment_hint"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "search",
"description": "Find the workspace's research records (projects, councils, syntheses, hypotheses,\n personas) matching `query`. Returns {results:[{id,title,url,text}]} — each `url` is the\n page to open, each `id` is fetchable. This is the cross-host retrieval entry point\n (ChatGPT Deep Research requires it); for the curated 300+ persona library use\n catalog_search instead, and to drive a project use start_project/start_run.",
"parameter_keys": [
"query"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "export_survey",
"description": "Render the survey as a SENDABLE, self-contained static HTML form (spa-min template) —\n works from file://, host it anywhere. Submissions produce a JSON payload shaped exactly\n like a SurveyResponse row: POSTed to `post_url` (overridable at fill-time via ?post=) or\n downloaded as a file to send back; either round-trips through import_survey_responses.\n Exporting a draft flips its status to open. No collection server in core.",
"parameter_keys": [
"out",
"post_url",
"survey_id"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "import_survey_responses",
"description": "Ingest a batch of REAL responses — a JSON list (the export form's payload shape:\n {respondent_key?, submitted_at?, answers: [{question_id, value}], source?}) and/or CSV text\n (one column per question id; ';' separates multi-select options). Every answer is validated\n against the instrument; re-importing the same batch is idempotent (deterministic ids).\n `source` labels the batch.",
"parameter_keys": [
"csv_text",
"responses",
"source",
"survey_id"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "record_hypothesis_result",
"description": "Attach the REAL-WORLD observation and flip the status. `source` is a Ref that must\n RESOLVE: a survey's imported responses ({kind:'survey', id}), attached evidence\n ({kind:'evidence', id}), a council/synthesis/session — or a free observation carried as\n text ({kind:'external', text}). The status (validated|refuted|inconclusive) is DERIVED by\n comparing observed against predicted; both raw values stay on the record, your argument\n goes in `note` — the verdict is auditable, never asserted.",
"parameter_keys": [
"hypothesis_id",
"note",
"observed_value",
"source"
],
"loaded": false
},
{
"name": "record_synthesis_section",
"description": "Persist one authored report section. `content`: {markdown, citations:[{study_id|council_id}],\n figures:[…]}. Figures can embed a chart — {kind:'chart', of:'<of>', series:[…], caption?} — to\n visualize the point; call suggest_chart_kinds for which `of` fits and its series shape.",
"parameter_keys": [
"content",
"project_id",
"report_id",
"section_id"
],
"loaded": false
}
],
"next": "Call mcp_describe_tool for details or mcp_load_tools to make selected tools callable."
}A
Reasoning#4 · 19:51:094k tok
Prepared tool call: mcp_load_tools.
Tool callmcp_load_tools#4 · 19:51:09 · call -> #5 · 19:51:09 · resultok
Arguments
{
"names": [
"search"
]
}Result
{
"loaded": [
"search"
],
"unavailable": [],
"active_tools": [
"mcp_search_tools",
"mcp_describe_tool",
"mcp_load_tools",
"mcp_search_playbooks",
"mcp_read_playbook",
"search"
],
"note": "Loaded tool schemas are available from the next model step onward."
}A
Assistant response#6 · 19:51:196k tok
Reaction test on eperi case study: positive sentiment from cost/effort reduction claims and Confidential Computing alignment, but credibility gaps around pricing, compliance verification, and unfamiliar model names create confusion. Gate passes with sentiment 0.56 >= 0.5.